Alcoghlan

December 2012

Hello, I'm Kolega2357. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gail Brady without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Kolega2357 (talk) 16:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gail Brady with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 16:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kolega2357. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gail Brady because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Kolega2357 (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Gail Brady for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gail Brady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gail Brady until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ColinFine (talk) 23:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)