Akyoyo94

Welcome!

Hello, Akyoyo94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on M1 Garand rifle. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Nukes4Tots (talk) 23:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Outburst Assist

A tag has been placed on Outburst Assist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Un-block Appeal

{{unblock-auto|192.168.1.106|Please. I wasn't the one screwing around with Christopher Reeve's article. My friend kept messing around, saying he wanted to use my account to edit his page because he didn't have one. I got tired of him and logged out, so he decided to make his own account ans screw around. He didn't know that if he got blocked, it would also affect my ENTIRE IP ADDRESS, so he just went off and messed up his article anyway. I was talking it over with him, though, and he says he took the article right off, anyway. He doesn't care about keeping that account. If getting my block lifted means deleting his account, that would be just fine with everybody. Akyoyo94 (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)|Gladys j cortez}}

I don't see a block on the IP. Perhaps it's a range block. Are you sure you copied the IP correctly. Try editing the sandbox then copy/paste here what you see when you attempt to edit it .— Ѕandahl ♥ 03:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

He's autoblocked because of the block on CREEVESUX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I've asked the blocking admin for input. CIreland (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

From the blocking admin: I'm talking this over with a couple of other admins--frankly, "it was my friend!" is like "the dog ate my homework" of vandalism rationales--but I AM looking into it, anyhow. (However, one point: your friend, no matter how often he repeats himself, DID NOT "take the article right off". As can be seen right here: the vandalism done by CREEVESUX to the Christopher Reeve article was undone by RainbowOfLight--not CREEVESUX, Akyoyo94, or anyone at 192.168.1.106. Can you see why I might be a wee bit likely to mistrust claims coming from this quarter, when this little myth has now been repeated several times?) Regardless of my personal opinion, I have opened a request at WP:AN/I to get feedback from uninvolved admins. I will abide by their advice. GJC 04:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

First, 192.168.1.106 is not your IP address. That's your local IP (see Private network). Secondly, it's possible that the friend tried to undo his own edit but he was too slow. Third, I don't like the idea of punishing a user for what another account does. This guy has made what 100 seemingly legit edits in the last month. I'd undo the rangeblock. Oren0 (talk) 04:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

YOU are unblocked. Your IP is unblocked. Your "friend" is not.

All right. Since the admin consensus is basically "be nice til you have good reason not to", I've unblocked the IP address. You should be able to edit under Akyoyo94 or any other username, other than the one that started this whole mess off. I HIGHLY recommend that you keep a close eye on your "friends" from now on, since if this happens again you know what to expect. Edit well. GJC 04:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I can tell you still don't believe me. I can see why it would seem that way. But thank you for looking into this further! I do consider myself a good contributor to Wikipedia, and I haven't been wrapped up in anything like this before, for sure. Next time this idiot comes over, I'm just going to lock my computer when I'm done, definitely. Sorry for having to take time away from you guys, have a good one!

Removed vandalism on Bloods

I'm sure this your edit was made with good intentions, but you should try to be more careful. Quite often vandals not only insert obscenities, but also delete some information. You need to check the article's history to ensure that your fix is correct. To revert single edit you may use (undo) option – it's on a right side of the difference screen (∆). More efficient way is to use special tools, such as Twinkle. Skarebo (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. But no worries, I looked at what was going to be undone; I really don't like pointless Wikipedia vandalism. Akyoyo94 (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Series ALFA Steel (Revolvers)

Thanks for converting those models to tables. It looked like such a pain in the butt. --Mblumber (talk) 01:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem. If I had known how to the first time, I would have done it like that. It was a pain in the butt doing both of 'em.Akyoyo94 (talk) 03:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Uzi Pistol has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't really unconstructive, I was trying to figure out how to move the page there because it had the wrong title.Akyoyo94 (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't appreciate the generic form responses. I've made hundreds of constructive pages and edits, I'm not completely new here.

Hey--first of all, Happy Thanksgiving! Second: I noticed this warning (somehow you're still on my watchlist from that thing with your friend who did the vandalism on Christopher Reeve). Anyhow, when I took a look at your edit, I agree that you were NOT trying to be unconstructive...but I wasn't entirely sure what you WERE trying to do. You said you were trying to "move the page there"--I'm assuming "the page" means "Uzi Pistol" and "there" is "Uzi submachine gun"--but actually MOVING the page there (if it's even possible--not sure if it is) would overwrite the current "Uzi submachine gun", which I'm pretty sure wasn't what you intended. So...what DID you intend? (Note--this isn't a warning, or even an implication that you did something wrong--I'm just trying to see if there's anything I can clarify or assist with. (Also, two more little things: one, I'm pretty sure the WP:MOS says that article titles should have only the first word capitalized--so the current article should be "Uzi pistol", not "...Pistol", so if you're creating a new article or moving something to a new title, that's something to remember. And two: as for the templated warning message...generally I try to write something more-individual for long-term "regulars" or even "anyone with an actual username"--but occasionally I just get lazy, and I can imagine other people doing the same. Please try not to take it personally--I don't think the user meant anything bad by it.)GJC 06:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah. I appreciate that. Well, I haven't moved a page before, I just like creating articles, and well, I was just trying to find a way to move the article "UZI Pistol" to "Uzi Pistol". But, I couldn't really see anyway to take down the re-direct page short of asking an admin to somehow work it all out for me. You can probably see why that would be stupid. So, yeah, I was just trying to be more specific on the article. I don't even remember why I capitalized the whole word when I made that article, that's not right at all. Thanks for the advice about creating, too. Akyoyo94 (talk) 04:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Now I see... I looked up all the following, and this is the State of the Uzi, so to speak:

1. "Uzi submachine gun"--the main article.
2. "Uzi pistol"--redirects to "Uzi submachine gun", directly to the "Variants" section.
3. "UZI pistol"--gives a "no such article" notice.
4. "UZI"--redirects to "Uzi submachine gun"
5. "Uzi"--redirects to "Uzi submachine gun"

Is that the way you wanted things to be, or do you think something should be different? If you want to create "UZI pistol", I would guess that the best thing to do would be to redirect it to the same thing "Uzi pistol" redirects to--the "Uzi submachine gun/Variants" section. Hope all this helps! GJC 05:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Yah, it helps. You're right, too, I checked everything and it seems to work just fine. Thanks for your help! Akyoyo94 (talk) 15:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A.G. Russell Sting

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A.G. Russell Sting, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

article on a knife although it may become notable at some point, Article also lacks reliable third-party sources also reads as a ad

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article M202A1 FLASH, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hohum (talk) 22:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nontheism

See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.

Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page MLS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! 23:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Note:Disambig pages never have "Disambiguation" in the title. Tommy! 23:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page MLS. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion, the above warnings were not warranted. You were WP:BOLD in restructuring the redirect and disambiguation pages. However, those changes have been reverted by editors who disagree. The next step in the WP:BRD process is to take this up on the relevant talk page (Talk:MLS). Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 00:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Akyoyo94. You have new messages at Tommy2010's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tommy! 00:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyvio in 2008 article creation

You seem to be inactive, but in fairness I need to notify you. Sorry it's a bit of a boilerplate template

Copyright problem: ALFA Combat

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as ALFA Combat, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.alfa-proj.cz/en/products/firearms/licensed-arms/pistols/pistols-combat-defender/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:ALFA Combat and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, ALFA Combat, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:ALFA Combat. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:ALFA Combat with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:ALFA Combat saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Akyoyo94. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Akyoyo94. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)