Airavan

June 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Take it to the article talk page if you think you are adding reliable sources. Making personal attacks won't help you. RexxS (talk) 03:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

How is a newspaper article not a reliable source. Even the British royal family, every royal family wiki pages cite newspaper and magazine sources. And for so long no one deleted it. When this page was recommended for confirmation even then the user didn’t change it. You all of a sudden popped up and deleted it today. Why ?? Fits or something?Airavan (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Airavan (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Megaman en m (talk) 10:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

RexxS (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement

I have opened a request for sanctions against you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. --RexxS (talk) 01:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 02:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

If you would like to post a response to the arbitration enforcement request at WP:AE § Airavan, please post your message here and I will copy it over. — Newslinger talk 02:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 08:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)