Aetempleton
WVAB
editI have reverted your changes to WVAB has most of the information you have posted it uncited and without references. Some of it, such as the licensee and other points, is down right incorrect. Please check your sources, find reliable third-part references, and come back. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop adding incorrect information to the page. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Documents you have on your person are not reliable third-party sources. The information you are posting is incorrect and uncited. It will not remain on the page unless it is referenced with sources found online, not on paper. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
editExtended content
|
---|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to WVAB, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I gave you two chances, now you are being warned for vandalism. Please stop. NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 07:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to WVAB. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 07:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Neutralhomer, you will be blocked from editing. NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 07:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC) This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User:Neutralhomer. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. NeutralHomer • Talk • 08:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 08:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC) |
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Administrative notes:
- When your edits are reverted with an explanation in the edit summary, do not reinstate them; try to engage in conversation with the editor, either at their talk page (please do not post messages at their user page as you did - those pages are not meant for communication) or here, or at the talk page of the article.
- Wikipedia aims to report notable information, which is verifiable from secondary reliable sources. Please do think about this as every word there is essential. Materialscientist (talk) 08:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- This edit made from your account contained legal threat. Wikipedia policy on that is clear: one can not edit wikipedia while having legal issues with it. If you wish to continue editing, please retract the above threat by stating so on this page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello...
editI was just about to leave you another note to give you some guidance. Please read Wikipedia:Administrators - you will find that this is merely a technical role, and as such, administrators have no more say over content than anyone else. Regards, Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)