Aesthetically appealing

I don't know what's happening with my Wikipedia page lol😂🤷🏻‍♀️

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pranali Rathod. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pranali Rathod shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ManaliJain (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Reliability and notability

I would like you to please go through WP:REFBEGIN, WP:RELIABLE, WP:VERIFY, WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RSPSS for a good understanding on verifiability and reliability. Also, kindly read WP:FILMCRITICLIST, which in simple words says that if an award has it's own page on Wikipedia than it could be considered notable otherwise not. I hope this might help you. Thanks, ManaliJain (talk) 09:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Temporary block from editing

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring on the article Pranali Rathod, continuing after being informed of Wikipedia's policy on edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Article protection

Please don't request protection for articles that are already protected. If you're having a dispute over the article content, please use the article talk page. You may also find the Wikipedia:A primer for newcomers page helpful. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Empty page by aesthetics lover

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Empty page by aesthetics lover, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Timothytyy (talk) 14:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Pranali Rathod for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aesthetically appealing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I tried editing a wiki page of Pranali Rathod and I editing it abide by all the rules and regulations of Wikipedia. I even ensured the dates and references of the awards were correct and also made sure I posted the image of Pranali Rathod from her social media handle only for the accuracy of her Wikipedia page, yet everytime ab editor tried to revert my edits. And when I asked for the reason on the summary and talk page, someone else blocked me to edit the page of Pranali Rathod for forever mentioning the reason that I wanted a dispute or fight. When in reality, it's not as I can see even though I wasn't successful in giving all the references of my addition to the page before being blocked; a new user named Going with the flow did on my behalf. And I would like to thank him/her publically for that. Dear Wikipedia administrators please consider my humble request and help me maintain the accuracy of that page. Thank you. Aesthetically appealing (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked from a single article out of the millions on Wikipedia, and haven't provided a good reason why you need to access the one where you had problems. I suggest you make edit requests on the talk page, and maybe once you show the problems are resolved, you can regain access. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

• As you have created Going with the flow to evade your block from editing Pranali Rathod, I have now extended your block site-wide.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

hi

{{db-u1}} Aesthetically appealing (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

It is not possible to delete an account on Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

then help me move this page or refrain from this account..like I am just stuck here and I can't even create other accounts coz my IP address is blocked. I mean I am getting what's going on with me and why so much of blockages just for a single edit I did (which I still think it's not wrong but facts and reference based but nevermind🙆🏻‍♀️)..Can you just give me any idea in regard to this ?! Help me out in this case please. Aesthetically appealing (talk) 07:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I am not getting* Aesthetically appealing (talk) 07:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)