Problems with upload of File:Chester Bay Album.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Chester Bay Album.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Chester Bay Recording.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:Chester Bay Recording.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Chester bay.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Chester bay.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Trout home.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Trout home.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Zollman Zoo.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Zollman Zoo.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rochester, Minnesota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hometown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem on Rochester, Minnesota edit

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.co.olmsted.mn.us/yourgovernment/pages/historyofolmstedcounty.aspx. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The North edit

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and in particular to articles about United States history and Minnesota. Several of your recent edits about a marketing campaign to rebrand Minnesota as "The North" have been reverted. Please seek consensus on the talk pages of articles before reinserting disputed content, Thank you. Minnemeeples (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why? It’s factual. Who has vested you with authority? Acrschmelzer (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not claiming authority. Not all facts are relevant to an encyclopedia. Some facts are are trivial, give undue weight to a viewpoint, or reflect current events without considering larger or long-term views. Wikipedia editing is by consensus. Discussing disputed content on the talk page of an article is a way to avoid an edit war. Minnemeeples (talk) 15:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply