Achecko

Achecko, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Achecko! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 15:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IEEE 1914.1 (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IEEE 1914.1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IEEE 1914.1, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Dear Heliosxeros, Thank you for your feedback. Could please you advice which portions of the text should be rewritten? I put several references to reliable source on my article.

Submission

Greetings. There is major fault in your submission. Most portions of your article is very promotional I must say. The outline for your article can be referred and copied from other similar articles on Wikipedia. Firstly, you used many technical terms and nomenclatures. It would be best to fine-tune it in a way that people from other fields or people without the knowledge are able to understand the article well. You can read WP:PUFFERY to help you with your choice of words. Secondly, the outline. Aspects like goals, scope, milestones are very promotional, as if extracted from a brochure. It is promotional in a sense that such content makes the writer as if he or she is intending to sell the content to the readers. Writing style must be as neutral as possible on wiki. See WP:NPOV. Lastly, your sources are poor. Cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books. Stay away from homepages and official websites. If any problems persist or if you wish to seek further clarity, feel free to post it to the AfC Helpdesk, link embedded on the declination banner at your submission page. Cheers and happy editing. EROS ^message 09:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:IEEE 1914.1

Hello, Achecko. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:IEEE 1914.1.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)