February 2022 edit

Hi Abdunibnabd, and welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits on Isra and Mi'raj because they go against the style guide which is currently adopted for Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. To read more about this style guide, please see MOS:ISLAM.

In a separate issue, the image that you removed from the page is there because it is a relevant and interesting historical work depicting the events described in the article. Even if you find it offensive, that is not a good enough reason to remove it from the article. To read more about the reasoning behind this, please see WP:CENSOR.

Please refrain from making similar edits again, and do respond here if you have any questions. Thanks — JThistle38 (talk) 23:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nuh Ha Mim Keller‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nuh Ha Mim Keller, you may be blocked from editing. Incorrect or inaccurate edit summaries are also a form of disruptive editing: "irrelevant material" does not justify removing sourced material or removing maintenance tags flagging the inappropriate use of primary material. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022 edit

  Hi Abdunibnabd! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Nuh Ha Mim Keller several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Nuh Ha Mim Keller, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abdunibnabd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 86.36.98.6. Place any further information here. Shaheed C. (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.