Rexy

Virgin 1

City In Fear is actually a US import, produced by '44 Blue Productions' and previously shown on 'MSNBC' (http://www.44blue.com/)

Extremely Out Of Control is also a US import, from 'Discovery' (http://www.alfredhaber.com/programs/m_extreme-out-control.html)

80.7.76.9 (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah and there was me thinking V1 had made some more shows themsleves, thanks for the info i've corrected the page --AJFurnell (talk) 13:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Rexy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Kendrick7^talk 17:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I know you from Digi Spy btw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben.hermenator (talk • contribs) 17:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

awesome!

Thanks a lot! — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 01:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Viewing shares

Please read the referenced source from BARB. It says:

* = figures are small but not zero

For decimal figures, where the actual value for a statistic is greater than zero but less than the value which would round to the smallest decimal used for the set of figures, * indicates a figure between zero and the smallest figure shown.

Where hour and minutes are shown, * indicates that the recorded figure is between zero and half a minute.

Therefore a channel with "*" in the columns, has a share between 0 and 0.1% Pleas stop providing inaccurate information. Astronaut (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

read your talk page,

I did. The information you are providing is inaccurate. A * indicates a share between 0 and 0.1%. Astronaut (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

You are trying to give the channel a better share than it deserves and trying to put it in the same league as Five Life +1 and others that can actually make a share of 0.0%, If BAAB thought it was worthy of 0.0% than they would put that, the fact they haven’t means that even putting it is being generous. Oh and stop putting times in next to the shows how many times do you need telling, Wikipedia is not a tv guide --AJFurnell (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

No I'm not trying to give the channel a better share than what you think it "deserves". There are channels with a 0.0% share (which looks a lot like zero viewers to me), but the footnote clearly states that * is a figure that is small but not zero. I suppose I am asking, why do you think 0.0% is in some kind of higher "league" than *?

I do know there are more than zero viewers. I have read elsewhere that Anime Central has attracted around 10,000 viewers per night though I don't know how accurate that figure is or whether that is some extraordinary peak in the viewing figures. but I make that around 0.015% (of 60 million potential viewers) ie. it is not 0.0%.

As for the times, I know Wikipedia is not a TV guide. However, the channel is sometimes unable to provide accurate information about the current schedule either on it's own website or through Sky's programme guide, therefore that information is useful to readers and I think it should stay.

Astronaut (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Having made a case to keep the times, I noticed you removed them again quoting policy. The policy is pretty clear, so lets leave it like that for a while and see if any other editors feel the times are useful. Astronaut (talk) 20:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Zattoo

Hi. I'm using your Zattoo article as template for the spanish article in the spanish wikipedia. I'd like you to notice me when you finish the History section to update the translation, thanks. (Please use es:Usuario_Discusión:YoaR to msg me)

YoaR (talk) 11:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

• Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
• Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
• News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
• Dispatches: Valued pictures
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

• Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
• News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
• WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

• News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
• Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

• From the editor: Writers needed
• Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
• Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
• News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Foolin

Good tips about that archiving stuff, thanks. Bib (talk) 08:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

• License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
• News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
• WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

• From the editor: Browsing the archives
• Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
• Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
• News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)