AAO2015
January 2015
edit
Hello, I'm Lightsout. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Timomatic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Lightsout (talk) 00:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, yes i added that on Timomatic's article because i saw an article only talking about him and JEFF. --11:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)AAO2015 (talk)
Nomination of A.T.M JEFF for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A.T.M JEFF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.T.M JEFF (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Afro-Australia Music and Movie Awards for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afro-Australia Music and Movie Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afro-Australia Music and Movie Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Etiennebaheza (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 01:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |