99.7.151.39

September 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.7.151.39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not trying to get around a block, and I am not editing actual Wikipedia pages. I am just commenting on the Noticeboard and requesting assistance from admins to address other editor's violations of the biography of living persons policies. Usually a block would be for disruptive editing, etc. but I am not doing any of that. There are false accusations within the sockpuppet investigation grouping me together with other users who I am not. I only edited the page briefly and since then I have had very little activity other than providing my comments to the Noticeboard. 99.7.151.39 (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Looks pretty clear to me that you are trying to get around a block, as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whey77/Archive. If that's not the case, you need to specifically address that. Restricting yourself to noticeboards (which, frankly, you are not doing) isn't relevant here. Yamla (talk) 17:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.7.151.39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not trying to get around a block, as the block expired. A block duration is related to a user likelihood of repeating inappropriate behavior. Ever since I was blocked, I have not tried to change any content on the biography (or any other actual encyclopedia pages). Instead I limited my comments to the Noticeboard and to the Talk pages on administrators asking them for assistance in oversight on the BLP policies. The block expired, and it does not seem fair or justified that it would be renewed when I have not even tried to edit the page any longer. There is speculation from involved parties in the dispute that I am Whey77 and other users and that is absolutely false and I am being wrongly accused. If other users have inappropriate behavior it should not include me simply by default as I am not connected to them in any way. 99.7.151.39 (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As you have at least one blocked account, you cannot edit under any account or IP. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---