To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

September 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angelina Ballerina: The Next Steps. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Poppy Cat (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lily's Driftwood Bay. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Poppy Cat (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kate Markowitz. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kate Markowitz. Don't change names without a reference supporting that change Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lily's Driftwood Bay, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Graham McTavish. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Lily's Driftwood Bay, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Graham McTavish. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Soulsville, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Pbroks13 (talk) 15:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm William Avery. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Make Way for Noddy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 11:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at How Many Birds. Binksternet (talk) 00:09, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at The Archies. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Verone66, also blocked as Special:Contributions/107.77.169.7. Binksternet (talk) 00:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 01:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page The Rolling Stones, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Volten001 18:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. FMSky (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.