99.181.136.216

July 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Freedom Flotilla II. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. In addition, verifiable RS supported opinions of notable people are proper for the article. Epeefleche (talk) 07:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please Stop

Final Warning: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Freedom Flotilla II. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. This article is currently under 1RR restriction.

In particular, the one-revert rule (1RR) states that:

1. Making more than one reversions on a page under 1RR restriction within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. In addition, as noted above, verifiable RS supported opinions of notable people are proper for the article.Marokwitz (talk) 08:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Flotilla article - deleted page headers

On July 5th, you deleted the page headers on the flotilla article that called for improved grammar and which suggested a merge.

If this was intentional, you must not do that without first getting consensus.

If it was accidental, welcome to wikipedia, but please be more careful in your edits.

-- Bob drobbs (talk) 00:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Jacobson

Hi, Jacobson opinion piece for CNN was written as a direct response to Walker's opinion piece for CNN. They are related. I think it's better to sample them both for balance. Sean.hoyland - talk 07:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

If you continue to disrupt the article, someone, maybe me, will request that your IP is blocked. Please stop. Don't edit war. The article is within scope of the discretionary sanctions. Have a read through them. Use the talk page to discuss the content. Yes, there are people posting all sorts of crap to that article but don't get dragged into edit warring by it. If you want to remove information that comes from reliable sources you will need to explain your reasons based on Wikipedia policy on the articles talk page. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm scared. It resets daily. Fuck you and your Zionist buddies. I will continue to edit this page in GOOD FAITH until I get bored battling Jewbotts.

um..you aren't meant to be scared. Its just an encyclopedia. You're supposed to enjoy helping to build it. Don't take it too seriously. I'm not a zionist but it would be better if you dropped the the jewbot crap. It doesn't help anything and it's not nice. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Ha! Riiiiight....because you and the other two morons definately ARE NOT policing this article for political reasons. As opposed to say, my honest indignation at having to sort through endless piles of Israeli propaganda and political threats when I just want to read about what's going on with the convoy. Normally my wiki activity is limited to editing out nationalist crap people insert into history articles.

Today it's you and your Temple buddies. Hey, wait! Maybe if your guys all rub your noses together you can triangulate my new IP address.

God, I had forgotten how funny Jew jokes are. If only I really was anti-Semetic....

Make sure you keep checkin' that page! I'll be back >:D

Yes, actually I am policing the article for political reasons which includes having to sort through endless piles of Israeli propaganda and dealing with bullshit edits by you because neutrality is a mandatory requirement in wiki articles. So, if you could just stick to constructive edits like this one and cut the crap it would be appreciated. Sean.hoyland - talk 09:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:99.181.136.216, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please stop your uncivil behavior immediately. Personal attacks against users such as Sean.hoyland are unacceptable. The following aggressive, rude remarks are unacceptable and are a clear indication of battleground mentality: "Fuck you and your Zionist buddies" " I will continue to edit this page in GOOD FAITH until I get bored battling Jewbotts." "battling Jewbotts" "you and your Temple buddies" Marokwitz (talk) 10:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Murphy link

The syntax for a wikilink would be [[Paul Murphy (....)|Paul Murphy]] with double square brackets. --Mirokado (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I won't fight the block as it's well deserved, but it would be nice if someone would attempt to prevent Soosim from tampering with the Paul Murphy info. He's been modifying the context of that statement in order to support the idea (false?) presented above that the convoy's main focus is bringing bulk food to Gaza, rather than things like medical supplies. This (Israeli?) misinformation has been repeated in news media and on this site. It is completely untrue. I know you don't have much reason to by sypmathetic with me due to my anti-Semetic trolling (*I* thought it was funny....) but my edits, with the exception of one where I was unaware of policy and had never heard of the guy (Howard Jacobson delete attempt), are in keeping with the spirit of wiki. The sentence Soosim keeps removing is accurate and has been properly sourced. Please, if you can find it within you, defend this information's integrity from the swarm of POV editors circling that page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.181.136.216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the block is well deserved, but it would be nice if someone would attempt to prevent Soosim from tampering with the Paul Murphy info. He's been modifying the context of that statement in order to support the idea (false?) presented above that the convoy's main focus is bringing bulk food to Gaza, rather than things like medical supplies. This (Israeli?) misinformation has been repeated in news media and on this site. It is completely untrue. I know you don't have much reason to by sypmathetic with me due to my anti-Semetic trolling (*I* thought it was funny....) but my edits, with the exception of one where I was unaware of policy and had never heard of the guy (Howard Jacobson delete attempt), are in keeping with the spirit of wiki. The sentence Soosim keeps removing is accurate and has been properly sourced. Please, if you can find it within you, defend this information's integrity from the swarm of POV editors circling that page.

Decline reason:

Didn't bother reading past the first sentence. This template is for unblock requests only. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jalapenos do exist

23:36, 5 July 2011 Jalapenos do exist (talk | contribs) (59,160 bytes) (The lead is not the place for the various back-and-forth arguments but for concise presentation of the parties' positions.)

Look at this edit and tell me this is legit.

The reference given was the official site of the Irish boat organizers and the wording came directly from their page. An entire sentence is devoted to calling such claims "paranoid" - does the other side not get one word?

If the spirit of this edit is legitimate both positions can be trimmed down significantly without completely removing this material.

---