96.57.23.83

November 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mad About You, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mad About You, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mad About You. Donner60 (talk) 03:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

96.57.23.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mrbrklyn". The reason given for Mrbrklyn's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".

• Blocking administrator: Guerillero (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Looks like autoblock is working as intended. SQL^{Query me!} 03:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.83 (talk • contribs)

Looking at your very recent block history for abusing multiple accounts / logged-out editing, it appears that the autoblocker is doing it's job in preventing you from editing. SQL^{Query me!} 04:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.57.23.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why are you blocking the NYLXS Library? 96.57.23.83 (talk) 04:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This isn't a library. Your IP resolves to a website, and I am close to extending this block to a {{webhostblock}} for a couple years. SQL^{Query me!} 04:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[www3 ~]# dig www.nylxs.com

<<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> www.nylxs.com

global options

+cmd

Got answer

->>HEADER<<- opcode

QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 29878

flags

qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3

OPT PSEUDOSECTION

EDNS

version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096

COOKIE

62801f3bc62ca35f24f910c55a59871b0bac57804bedaf90 (good)

QUESTION SECTION

www.nylxs.com. IN A

ANSWER SECTION

www.nylxs.com. 86400 IN A 96.57.23.83 <<===

AUTHORITY SECTION

nylxs.com. 86400 IN NS www2.mrbrklyn.com. nylxs.com. 86400 IN NS www3.mrbrklyn.com. nylxs.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.linuxmafia.com.

ADDITIONAL SECTION

www2.mrbrklyn.com. 86400 IN A 96.57.23.82 www3.mrbrklyn.com. 86400 IN A 96.57.23.83

Query time

0 msec

SERVER

96.57.23.83#53(96.57.23.83)

WHEN

Fri Jan 12 23:12:11 EST 2018

MSG SIZE rcvd

194

This is the library of NYLXS. I just came to look up some data on a test LTS project without systemd ... but whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.83 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 13 January 2018

February 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.57.23.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

there is no reason for any block. You are blocking an entire library without cause

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.57.23.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

there is no reason for any block. You are blocking an entire library without cause

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.57.23.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not evading and blocks.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL^{Query me!} 14:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You must think we are idiots. We aren't. Any admin considering lifting this block, note that we have ironclad evidence that this IP address is used by the block-evading vandal, Mrbrklyn (talk · contribs). Feel free to contact me if you can't find that evidence independently. In fact, I'm considering extending the block substantially. It certainly should be upgraded from an anon-only block and should really be extended. --Yamla (talk) 13:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.57.23.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not evading and blocks.

Decline reason:

Right. Block extended, hardened, and talk revoked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

No such thing was do. Only edits with explanations, and very small ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.83 (talk • contribs)

This is not factually accurate. See for example, this and this, both of which removed cited content. Note that I'm not the person who gave you the warning at the beginning of this section. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

It is factually accurate and your stupid links verify. Keep me out of your petty wikipedia nonsense. You guys are so messed up. Get a life

---