96.18.219.55

October 2020

Hello, I'm TowardsTheLight. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Age of the universe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. TowardsTheLight (talk) 07:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 03:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hey Diddle Diddle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.18.219.55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

that was someone else

Decline reason:

If you were not responsible for the activities that led to the block, you should request an account at WP:ACC to avoid getting caught up in blocks meant to target others. 331dot (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.18.219.55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

that was someone else

Decline reason:

Obviously not. Yamla (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Ok.96.18.219.55 (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

idea. topic block. ut's like a tobic ban excpet it's a block.

Partial blocks are now possible, from specific pages or specific namespaces. While there is a block on this IP, this page may be only used to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 17:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

1,251,463,669 {{Kitten}

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Rotflolmao

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Rotflolmao, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sjö (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC) DELETE IT NOW!96.18.219.55 (talk) 15:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Admin Delete Now!

{{adminhelp}}

September 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.18.219.55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I Want the page deleted not blockd

Decline reason:

I want a winning lottery ticket. Yamla (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.18.219.55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Here You go. 4 5 11 33 44 22 bonus number 21.

Decline reason:

Bye! Favonian (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Congratulations, you won a talk page access revocation. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

---