December 2023 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bigger Than the Whole Sky, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ippantekina (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bigger Than the Whole Sky.
A type of cabinet (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Don’t come to my page making threats to get your way. I’m not being disruptive you and the other user are by adding unnecessary subtitles to the infobox, making inconsistent edits between different pages and editing warring with someone removing redundant information and keeping things consistent and it’s not right having two users ganging up on on person, ever heard of bullying? That’s exactly what this is. I’m in the UK and will press cyber bullying charges against Wikipedia as we have laws against threatening people and bullying them when they are doing nothing wrong and the ones in the wrong are the ones who are adding redundant information and inconsistent edits. 92.1.70.84 (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)- Will be reporting then. I did nothing wrong and this is 3 people ganging up on one. That’s the very definition of cyber bullying. 92.1.70.84 (talk) 21:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
92.1.70.84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
False accusation of disruptive editing, I was doing nothing but making pages look good and match a GA article only to end up cyber bullied and the one doing the right thing gets ganged up on and blocked for no reason. 92.1.70.84 (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You clearly don't understand how Wikipedia works. See WP:CONSENSUS. Yamla (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
92.1.70.84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
False claims of disruptive editing. Apparently people don’t know this is cyber bullying I was not doing anything disruptive. I was making edits that two users didn’t agree on, but doesn’t make them right and was threatened for making articles look like a GA article. I have already sent an email to Wikpedia showing them the evidence and telling them where this can go. The wrong one is being punished when its two others who were being disruptive. 92.1.70.84 (talk) 22:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You'll need to withdraw your legal threats if you want any chance to be unblocked now. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
- I would suggest the next admin who checks this please look at the link I posted as the following is happening and this page has evidence of it:
- Virtual mobbing or dog-piling
This is causing me alarm and distress as it’s triggering my PTSD as I was wrongfully banned instead of the two people who were dog piling on me for making pages look the same and removing redundant information. This is causing me to relive previous traumas of my abusive father and r@pist both of who blamed an punished me for their wrong, one with physical abuse and another punished me with r@pe and so UK law has been broken. I know I was doing nothing wrong and I now the other two were. Laws are laws and they need to be respected and taken into consideration. Ty. To quote the page: “You may be committing a criminal offence if the cyber-bullying is causing ‘alarm or distress’ to the victim (under the Harassment Act 1997). Or can be considered ‘grossly offensive’ (Malicious Communications Act 1988 and the Communications Act 2003)” 92.1.70.84 (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |