August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Paradise garden, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStartalk 10:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sensory garden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DoorsAjar (talk) 10:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Sensory garden with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStartalk 10:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sensory garden. —MelbourneStartalk 10:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Portal:Liberia/Intro— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff | Who, me? 13:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Athlone has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 TT me 11:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rapids— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geordie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Enigma machine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 09:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Rose. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Johann Wolfgang Döbereiner, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Johann Wolfgang Döbereiner. CLCStudent (talk) 13:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unable to edit Wikipedia from Leigh Park Library, Hampshire

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.224.27.227 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unable to edit Wikipedia from Leigh Park Library, Hampshire

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla. I am at a public library. I cannot create an account from here with the restrictions on this account. I have no access to an account I can use to edit wikipedia and I'd regard a login as insecure. So what do you suggest please. Thankyou.91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.224.27.227 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Triggering unblock request again. Thankyou 91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This library's IP address is blocked for anonymous editing because of persistent disruption. Please use the Internet elsewhere to create a user account. You can then log into it at the library to edit Wikipedia. Sandstein 16:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


A temp unblock of 1 hour would be sufficient. Thankyou.91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:05, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Patrick, Wheeler (2017). Ribbons among the Rajahs — A History of British Women in India before the Raj. Barnsley: Pen & Sword History. ISBN 9781473893276. OCLC 993041838. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)

91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Authordom: Please sign your entry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Mahila Congress and then trout yourself, or alternatively can Yamla do it for Authordom please. 91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Talk:BJP Mahila Morcha

edit

@Sandstein: Thankyou for your good faith closing of Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 February 20 and relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BJP Mahila Morcha ... However I notice no talk page appears to be present. Now it may be there was no talk page to the lamentable article ... but if there is I will let you determine between yourself and Cryptic who deserves the WP:TROUT. 91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is a trout I normally deserve, but I actually did remember to restore the talk page this time. There just wasn't ever anything there except those templates. —Cryptic 16:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
In the 4 mins I have left on this terminal ... overlooked by a youngster who the librarian thinks is my grandaughter ... I am almost certain I was correct but must apologies and accept WP:TROUTs if it was not. Should be assigned WikiProject Women though. Thankyou. 91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ok admins Cryptic, MissVain & Cryptic That looks like a one-nil WP:TROUT from the Admins on the anon muggles. However when re-opening a discussion as a relist I think I note the delsort alerts are lost on the target pages which kind of stuffs ongoing discussions a little ... perhaps a lesson learned and maybe a 1:1 WP:TROUT or is that admins 2 anon muggle 0 ? ( ... That was getting really dodgy in the Parkie library and tis a tad more comfortable over the Harry county line). Not commenting this on the AfD as it would be distractional. Thankyou. 86.183.88.28 (talk) 16:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've just added the DRV result to the talk page and claiming a 1-2! Up the Hawks! 86.183.88.28 (talk) 17:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Creating account from blocked IP

edit

Attempts to create an account means:- Account creation error Jump to navigationJump to search You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from 91.224.27.227 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Widr‬ for the following reason(s): Kgpg new.svg To edit, please log in. Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. This block has been set to expire: 09:23, 13 September 2020. Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Username policy · Appealing blocks: policy and guide If the block notice is unclear, or it does not appear to relate to your actions, please ask for assistance as described at Help:I have been blocked. Return to Main Page.

Wunderbar! 91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


So if a group of people were taken to a resource centre in a Hants, UK library they'd be unable to create Wikipedia logins. Fantastic! 91.224.27.227 (talk) 16:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 13:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to British Rail Class 150. Samf4u (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply