Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 86.146.209.237, has made edits to 5.56×45mm NATO that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Jerod Lycett (talk) 00:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Jerodlycett: I doubt that Wikipedia's policies include putting the bullets of a bullet pointed list in the middle of the illustration that they are next to. This is a known limitation of the Wikipedia interface on most browsers. Indeed bulleted list are deprecated for just this reason and should be presented in prose. 86.146.209.237 (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
It is not deprecated, and what you're attempting goes against MOS:NOBR. Jerod Lycett (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Jerodlycett: But once again, you have put the bullets in the middle of the illustration NOT next to the text where they belong. Bulleted list do not work where they are next to illustrations and they never have. Even {{bulleted list}} does the same thing. It is possible that you have one of the very few browsers that render the bullets correctly, but the great majority do not. 86.146.209.237 (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Philishave is a discontinued brand edit

Articles about discontinued brands are given in the past tense. Pontiac automobiles are still being driven, but because the brand is discontinued, the Wikipedia article about Pontiac cars are in the past tense. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Steelbeard1: The manual of style says different. The Pontiac article is wrong and does not follow the WP:MOS (now fixed). See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Per MOS:TENSE, articles are written in the present tense unless the "product no longer meaningfully exists". Philishave branded razors are still in existence and so qualifies for the present tense. Also see the first example of correct usage, "The PDP-10 is a mainframe computer family manufactured by Digital Equipment Corporation from 1966 into the 1980s" (my emphasis). This in spite of the PDP-10 not having been manufactured for over 30 years. They still exist (though most probably in museums).
Whether you or I deem it right or wrong is irrelevant. It so happens that I agree with you, but WP:MOS says otherwise. 86.146.209.237 (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply