82.214.239.4

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

09:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

April 2016

Hello, I'm Mr. Smart LION. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Svalbard— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 13:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. like this edit summary, where you said "Learn grammar before editing!". It's personal attack which could result a block. — TOG 16:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated harassment and incivility (here, here, here, and here) in spite of the restored warning that you blanked above. Once you have demonstrated that you have read and comprehended the WP:CIVIL guideline and agree to abide by it, you may request unblocking. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Amatulić (talk) 21:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Also, removing messages related to this block will result in losing your access to this talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.214.239.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

nonsensical reason for block, unsupported by any facts, no warning given, no opportunity to defend myself against this allegation, punitive length.

Decline reason:

Block seems justified to me. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking admin additionally inappropriately removing this unblock request and threatening me. 82.214.239.4 (talk) 21:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

You were warned about removing the messages related to this block. Congratulations, now you have no access to this talk page. If you wish to continue pursuing being unblocked, you may contact administrators by submitting a request to Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Peanut— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax 13:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Carob— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.214.239.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Suddenly blocked for no apparent reason. What is the problem? 82.214.239.4 (talk) 08:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This IP address has been used by a banned user with a long-term history of abusing Wikipedia. If that is not you, you should request the creation of an account at WP:ACC to avoid these sorts of issues. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.214.239.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So what if it has been? I was in the middle of making some very necessary improvements to Nyeri, among other articles. You prefer articles to contain egregious errors? There was no reason to block me, and the block is harming Wikipedia. 82.214.239.4 (talk) 08:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you want to make what you deem to be necessary improvements, please proceed as I state above. However, while I assumed good faith, I agree with the blocking admin that you are likely the targeted individual, and as such I am removing your talk page access. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---