May 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at John Bolton. Toa Nidhiki05 12:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

John R. Bolton

edit

Please discuss and obtain consensus before adding that back. It has been said your source does not support your content. Thanks.12:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

You also appear to be edit warring (see wp:editwarover this, I advise you to stop before the ban hammer is wielded. I also suggest reading wp:BLP and wp:RSSlatersteven (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at John R. Bolton. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at John R. Bolton. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply