71.64.6.46

August 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Acalamari 08:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4) was changed by 71.64.6.46 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956968 on 2012-08-12T01:22:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Brickmack. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 9), because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BrickmackTalkContribs 03:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. BrickmackTalkContribs 03:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -— Isarra ༆ 17:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Webclient101 (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Let me just say for the record that there is a perfectly good reason I am making these personal attacks. SpongeBob isn't anywhere NEAR as put together as it used to be, so I'd be surprised if anyone over, let's say 7-9 would even care about the new episodes. They are beyond retarded, and there shouldn't be any excuse for people to even watch them. So if you guys don't like my personal attacks, well then, tough shit, because that just proves right there that you guys are totally unaware of what the show has really become. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

It seem's that you don't understand what I'm telling you. Yes, I agree Spongebob Squarepants has gone really downhill and the plot of each episode is annoying and stale. But you can't rant about a show on the articles talk page. The talk page for the article is a place to actually improve the article itself, not to discuss about the show itself. If you want to rant about how bad a show is, you should post it on online discussions. A user removed your content because of the reasons I just said above. You undid his edit and used attacks against him, by cursing him out. The next time you make a personal attack against a editor, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Webclient101 (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank YOU for agreeing with me, because I know for a fact that the only people that would watch so much as a minute of any SpongeBob episode released past 2005 are a bunch of braindead toddlers. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I hate having to block people, but you've got to tone down the personal attacks (as pointed out to you previously) and cut out talk about "losers". Passion is great, but not particularly useful in building an encyclopaedia. Encylopaedias are not written as vessels of civilization's great passions (or even little passions, like SpongeBob SquarePants). So maybe bring your dispassionate side to Wikipedia to build dry but useful articles on SpongeBob, et al, and then take your passionate side to a better place like a forum or a blog to tell folks how you really feel about the series.

In the meantime, while you're blocked take a few minutes to read this one page: "What Wikipedia is not"

I think you'll better understand where we're coming from. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

PS I wouldn't be spending the time to write this if I didn't think you had a lot to offer us, assuming you can work yourself into our way of doing things here.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are almost certainly a sock of 71.74.87.105, who is currently blocked for 6 months. You have identical interests, the same Internet provider, and are both in Westerville, Ohio. Meters (talk) 01:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

How the hell do you know I live in Westerville? --71.64.6.46 (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at User talk:71.64.6.46. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See also: 71.74.87.105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:11, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

The End Is Near

It has been scientifically proven that the world will indeed end on December 21, 2012. The economy will collapse, and there will be a World War 3 and Holocaust 2. Barack Obama is once again president because SpongeBob killed Mitt Romney today at 2PM with a gun. Apparently, SpongeBob was a Democrat. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 19:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Template:SpongeBob SquarePants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Welcoem back from your block. You clearly have no intention of stopping your vandalism. Meters (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't believe in the end of the world or the Mayan Calendar. How surprising! There was absolutely no editing done to this page for over 2 months and all of the sudden some guy tells us this studff! There will NOT be a Apocalypse!

And how would we know that 'Mitt Romney is dead' rumor is true? SpongeBob could'nt have killed him! It's not even election time yet! Mitt Romney is actually trying to boost the economy with his jobs plan! And he is NOT dead!!! --71.64.6.46 (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, I'm ScottMHoward. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Evanescence because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 23:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You black piece of trash. Go to hell. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 23:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, I'm Nowyouseeme. Your recent edit to the page Grouplove appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NYSMy talk page 23:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Weeknd. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

You're a dumb American piece of shit. I can do whatever I want you Islam jack ass. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 23:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

---