It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Ceraurus.
Please refer to RFCU for evidence. See block log.

This complaint has been examined and rejected: clic RFCU link. Ceraurus Ceraurus (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser) Arthur Ellis (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser) Explanation of the request for CheckUser. Pete Peters 17:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Ceraurus account was banned indefinitely on 20 May 2006. A new account by the name Arthur Ellis emerged on the 23 May 2006.

Arthur Ellis is the only account to defend Ceraurus on Ceraurus user talk page.[1] In fact Arthur Ellis’s first entry was on Ceraurus user talk page.[2]

Arthur Ellis and Ceraurus are the only two accounts that have made edits regarding Rachel Marsden, Mark Bourrie, and Warren Kinsella.

Ceraurus is Mark Bourrie, and should not be allowed to dominate the Warren Kinsella's Wikipedia entry. The two don’t like each other, and in the past Mr. Kinsella has filed suit against Mr. Bourrie.

I am hoping that Arthur Ellis is proven to be a sock puppet of Ceraurus. I am also hoping that he not be allowed to ever again to dominate Wikipedia entries, like he has done in the past.




I am not Mark Bourrie or Ceraurus. "Pete Peters" is a new account set up to stalk and attempt to out me. Pls. check his poostings and block account for vandalismArthur Ellis 21:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


Declined. Mackensen (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

edit

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Ceraurus"


Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bucketsofg 17:20, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 17:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


It's not content, it's garbage.

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Bucketsofg 17:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:Kc9cqj, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Bachrach44 18:08, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


  You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against 31 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.
Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

Joelito (talk) 18:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:CivEarth

edit

  Hello, 70.51.52.253. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CivEarth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply