November 2019 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (help!) 19:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

70.240.227.1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was block by JzG for reverting edits here Triggered. I took out an offensive picture (which JzG uploaded) of a tweet by non-notable trolls with only two thousand twitter followers. I gave my reasons for taking out the image, it being undue and promoting aspiring comedians, and rather than discussing this or telling me why this was "disruptive editing" he blocked me. 70.240.227.1 (talk) 03:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Guy, can I lift this block now? The picture in question is up for deletion as a copyvio, and the article is not under 1RR. – bradv🍁 06:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'm lifting this block to allow for further discussion, preferably on the talk page of the article, and to create an account as JzG has suggested. – bradv🍁 15:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Bradv, the file is not up for deletion, a bot tags unused unfree media for CSD so any time it's removed from the article it gets tagged. If the IP wants to discuss on talk rather than simply removing, fine, but if you look at previous contributions (e.g. [1]) I see significant evidence of WP:RGW. My strong suggestion to you, anonymous editor, would be to create an account so there is a stable venue for discussing these things with you. Guy (help!) 12:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry edit

Sorry about this inconvenience, and thanks to Bradv for unblocking. The issue here is that if an image like this is removed from an article (you did so twice) it immediately gets tagged by bots and that makes a whole lot of extra work to clean up. I raised it on the article Talk page, which is where it needs to be discussed. Guy (help!) 17:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply