May 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lester Holt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Has nothing to do with the article. KNHaw (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, for future reference, I think it's important to lead with it doesn't fit in this section or that it might be better placed in other pages. To lead with it's not "constructive" suggests that it's not an issue with accuracy (which should be paramount) but your own perception of what is ok or not. Thanks.

May 2018 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NBC Nightly News has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary sanctions notice edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

6 May 2018 edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at William F. Lee. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 10:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on NBC Nightly News. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 05:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.