66.183.230.46

January 2019

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a set opinion, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Abiogenesis seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

How do you figure the published article is a 'neutral point of view'??? The original article was DEFINITELY NOT neutral!

See WP:NOTNEUTRAL and WP:MAINSTREAM. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Ohhhhhh... it's not.. Wikipedia must state your particular world view and anything and anyone that disagrees with you is prohibited. Hmm...sounds a lot like Germany 1935-1945, Russia when it was the Soviet Union or China today. Sorry, didn't know wikipedia was a communist site, sorry my mistake. Then why not be honest about it? Why be clandestine about it? Why are you hiding the fact that this is a communist site?

Ahso, what you are saying it's 'free' in cost, but not thinking. Again, my mistake.

You've again mistaken Wikipedia for a democratic society where social freedom, personal expression and the liberty thereof are values placed above all other. In such a society McCarthyism is a malignant prejudice designed to silence opinions and constrain political thought. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. A book. An online repository. The people who are making it are doing a job. They're working and they are adhering to a basic set of management principles. If this were a company, like the marketing department of coco cola for example, it would be perfectly reasonable for the company to have principles, which say, "no - we don't want that". And to enforce them if employees persistently acted in contrary.

For some reason, because a group of editors have objected to your contributions and you have found no support, you accuse the project of being Machiavellian, whereas the reality is that your content has been looked at (ad nauseam) and has been rejected.

You are required to disclose COI here. Just like you are required to sign NDAs or exclusivity contracts if you work for coco cola.

In fact the only real difference between this organization and a company is that we don't fire or sue people when they come into the office and spend all day bending the ear of everyone they meet, telling colleagues what a bunch of pigs we and the company are for not seeing eye to eye with them.

In a nutshell - its OK for Wikipedia to have policies, its OK for Wikipedians to decide they don't like certain content and its OK to exclude that content from our pages.

Edaham (talk) 04:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Copy/pasted from User talk:Morgan Leigh. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---