62.49.119.18

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

16:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
JesseRafe (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Malerooster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.--Malerooster (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to South Jamaica, Queens have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 07:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/62.49.119.18, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JesseRafe (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Same blocked user now using 86.151.50.218

For future reference, the user behind this IP address identified at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/62.49.119.18/Archive is also now using 86.151.50.218 (currently blocked for one week, started day after SPI was closed). JesseRafe (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Frenchie (rapper). JesseRafe (talk) 16:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/62.49.119.18, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JesseRafe (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/62.49.119.18, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JesseRafe (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Old Time's Sake

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Old Time's Sake, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to AZ (rapper), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Nas, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Juvenile (rapper). Removed clearly cited material. Final warning for this group of disruptive edits. You on this and every one of your DOZENS of IP addresses have had sufficient warning. JesseRafe (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

JesseRafe Capone-N-Noreaga worked with DJ Premier. JesseRafe I didn't do disruptive editing.

You did. You're a constant disruption and you never respond to any comments or conversation until you are already blocked. All you then do is just repeat that you didn't do what you were accused of, which is absurd. Every action on Wikipedia is recorded and every article has its history just as every user has their list of contributions. You can't escape your actions by denying them. You also can't just make up who you think should be listed as an Associated Act or make any other changes because you think that's better. Things need sources, like the source that states Juvenile's birth year. Go start your own blog if you think GangStarr was founded in Boston (it wasn't), where you can state your lies and inconsequential trivia, it doesn't belong here. JesseRafe (talk) 19:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

You're lying DJ Premier and Capone-N-Noreaga worked together. I edit any fact and leave them alone JesseRafe. JesseRafe Juvenile wasn't born in 1977. He was born in 1975.

How am I lying about something I never said? Who is talking about Preemo and CNN here? You're either delusional or a little kid. I mentioned GangStarr in my comment which has nothing to do with CNN and even though Guru is from Boston (or Roxbury), that doesn't mean GangStarr is from Boston, as the two met in Brooklyn. It also doesn't matter when you think Juvenile was born, all the matters here at WP is that there is a source that says 1977, and nothing but your opinion that says 1975. If you have a problem with that source, take it up on the article's talk page. But by edit-warring and adding your opinion you are being disruptive and that is why you are blocked. Again. Please read about Wikipedia's policies and learn how to productively contribute to the encyclopedia, or else you'll just be blocked again and again if you continue your current practices. JesseRafe (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

JesseRafe I didn't do disruptive editing. It's a lie that Juvenile was born in 1977. Encyclopedia.com's lying plus it says Lil' Kim was born on 11th July 1977. She was born on 11th July 1974. JesseRafe I didn't do Frenchie vandal. I edited his page. I edited Frenchie's asscociated acts.

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lox. Binksternet (talk) 09:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Onyx (hip hop group). Block evasion... See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Frenchie vandal. Binksternet (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

LTA Frenchie vandal

This IP address is one of hundreds confirmed to be the work of the Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Frenchie vandal. JesseRafe (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

---