62.145.196.138

January 2024

Hi 62.145.196.138! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sōtō several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sōtō, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

guy read the talk page and look at how they edit and talk and tell me with a straight face they aren't trying to bully me

last article took 2 months of waiting and trying to resolve

it only got attention and fixed after i just started editing myself

pls fk off with this bs biased moderating 62.145.196.138 (talk) 08:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

THATS WEIRD

i dont see a warning like this on joshuas page

ykno

the more experienced guy who should know better then.. the one who keeps reverting the edits without trying to talk? 62.145.196.138 (talk) 08:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JimRenge (talk) 09:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Time upgraded to 72 hours per request at UTRS. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---