Reply to your message at WP:Help desk

edit

Hello! Wikipedia aims to provide balanced, neutral coverage of all viewpoints, proportional to their prevalance in reliable sources. As it currently stands, you will find that many of the concerns you raised are covered on Wikipedia, though not necessarily on the biography article Joe Biden, which only briefly summarizes his Presidency.

Wikipedia's coverage of notable controversies and criticisms involving Joe Biden and his family includes but is not limited to:

If the claims that his actions with children are borderline pedophilia and everything he touched was destroyed represent significant viewpoints among reliable sources (not among Wikipedia editors), then the fact that those sources have made these claims this can be included in an article where appropriate (and with an appropriate citation). If you have any specific suggestions for improving the neutrality of a Wikipedia article, you should bring it up on that article's talk page.

It can be frustrating to discover that the consensus of reliable sources does not fully reflect your own viewpoint on an issue, but this does not diminish Wikipedia's value as a reference work. If you would like to read an alternative encyclopedia which better echos your own political viewpoints, or one which is based on alternative sources (possibly containing alternative facts!) you may enjoy Conservapedia, or another from our List of online encyclopedias.

I hope this helps, RoxySaunders (talk · contribs) 21:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense, just looking at the crap on your Trump page proves you are a bunch of leftist, biased, censoring clowns. Nobody takes wiki seriously, it is run by morons who try to censor the truth. Biden is the worst president in history with a current approval rate of 39%. There is a FACT, put that on the Biden page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.88.81.101 (talk)
Feel free to go somewhere else then. Further off-topic rants will result in your editing privileges being temporarily removed. Wikipedia is not a forum or soapbox. clpo13(talk) 03:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is exactly why nobody trusts a wiki, the wiki is a JOKE. Thanks for confirming this, troll. 50.88.81.101 (talk) 04:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Euryalus (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

On review your edit history is entirely personal opinions and WP:BLP violations. Neither are suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Your IP address has been blocked from editing to prevent further unsourced edits like these. Appeal options are in the attached template. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply