47.188.140.129

August 2023

Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Washington Post, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 11:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

[[1]] "Washington Post pretends to defend 'democracy' but here's what news outlet really means" 47.188.140.129 (talk) 20:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Yet you pretend to know how to add material to an encyclopedia without ever once bothering to cite a source, so how are you any different? LoL! Skyerise (talk) 23:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

And then in response to not citing a source, you demonstrate that you don't know the difference between a news story an an opinion piece. Opinion pieces are just that, some writers opinion. They are not fact, and we don't cite facts to them. Stop wasting your time and ours and find another hobby. Skyerise (talk) 23:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

You watch too much CNN 47.188.140.129 (talk) 00:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

According to allsides.com The Washington post has a liberal bias [[2]] 47.188.140.129 (talk) 01:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Fascinating. Drmies (talk) 01:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

According to the Interactive Media Bias Chart, Fox News has a strong right bias. So? If you want unbiased news, apparently you should stick to NPR News Now, Reuters and The Hill. Skyerise (talk) 10:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

The Hill is liberal as well. 47.188.140.129 (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Haven't you got a conspiracy to attend to? Skyerise (talk) 21:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm not a goshdarn conspiracy theorist! 47.188.140.129 (talk) 22:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop your long-term messing around with the Karen Chandler article. You seem to have no idea that you HAVE TO CITE SOURCES to make additions to Wikipedia. Anything added WITHOUT A RELIABLE SOURCE will always just be reverted. You are wasting other editors time. Just STOP. We don't care about death hoaxes, it's pointless trivia which adds absolutely nothing to the reader's understanding of the subject. Skyerise (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

This actually happened. 47.188.140.129 (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

It does not matter. It was trivial, and unverified. Drmies (talk) 00:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Sorry. I will stop. 47.188.140.129 (talk) 22:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Karine Jean-Pierre, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 22:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

They just split this week. 47.188.140.129 (talk) 22:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

CS1 error on Jim Edmonds

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jim Edmonds, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

---