November 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm YorkshireLad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sorry (Justin Bieber song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. YorkshireLad (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sorry (Justin Bieber song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robvanvee 08:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Airbus A330, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox instead. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Natufians

edit

Hi! I verified that, in fact, the citation to Fregel is wrong in the topic on Natufian archaeogenetics, as she says nothing about Lazaridis (2018), neither in the article nor in the supplementary text. The correct citation should be to the preprint of Lazaridis (2018). I will prepare a new wording for this section.

As for Lazaridis (2016), he not only states that there is no sub-Saharan ancestry in Natufians, but also that it would not be possible to measure North African ancestry. Shriner contradicts this, pointing to significant percentages of both North African and sub-Saharan ancestry (in this case, related to modern Omotic people). Therefore, Shriner's novelty is not limited to pointing out sub-Saharan ancestry, but also North African, which Lazaridis had not done. In 2018, Lazaridis, in possession of the Taforalt data, states that the common DNA between Natufians and Taforalt came from Africa to the Levant, not the other way around. I will also write a new essay here that takes into account your considerations and mine. Dealmeida87 (talk) 17:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

It was clarified that the Fregel article being referenced was from 2021, not 2018. Another user inserted the quotes. Dealmeida87 (talk) 21:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply