38.122.136.26

March 2016

cool...quit promoting trump..you're promoting trump and its likely you work for his campaign so that's a conflict of interest and against the rules Hello, I'm Lazylaces. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Anthony Comstock— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 19:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Comstock, you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 06:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016 was changed by 38.122.136.26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923785 on 2016-03-25T08:49:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Donald Trump presidential campaign endorsements, 2016. Stop or you will be banned. HarryKernow (talk) 09:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm SilverplateDelta. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Prion has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. SilverplateDelta (talk) 21:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jaime Crunchbird ‎, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop removing tags from articles. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

this is a message to let you know that I have been a contributor to this page because the subject has been a significant influence on the Seattle music industry since the 1980's and I am familiar with his work- having said that, if you will peruse the following wikipedia policy, from what I can tell, you have no basis for deleting this page----- to wit: Alternatives to deletion THE ARTICLE CLEARLY STATES THAT DISPUTES OF CONTENT ARE NOT RESOLFED BY DELETING THE PAGE PLEASE SEE BELOW. Editing and discussion Main page: Wikipedia:Editing policy

• _{If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. Vandalism to a page's content can be reverted by any user.}

Disputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe cases. The content issues should be discussed at the relevant talk page, and other methods of dispute resolution should be used first, such as listing on Wikipedia:Requests for comments for further input. Deletion discussions that are really unresolved content disputes may be closed by an uninvolved editor, and referred to the talk page or other appropriate forum. If an article on a notable topic severely fails the verifiability or neutral point of view policies, it may be reduced to a stub, or completely deleted by consensus at WP:AfD. The Arbitration Committee has topic-banned editors who have serially created biased articles. Disagreement over a policy or guideline is not dealt with by deleting it. Similarly, issues with an inappropriate user page can often be resolved through discussion with the user.

April 2017

Hello, I'm Karst. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Jack Endino have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Karst (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Widr (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Mountain Goats, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Mountain Goats. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---