2A02:FE1:7191:F500:1D68:AEEA:EBA5:D751

Unwelcome on Wikipedia

Your pointy, threatening, and far too personalised comments on Talk:Intelligence and How to Get It are unwelcome on Wikipedia. I've removed them;: don't put them back. What's your account, please? Bishonen | tålk 17:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC).

June 2024

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.

Here's the diff: [1]. Please take it to an appropriate noticeboard like WP:FTN if you'd like to solicit wider involvement from the community. Generalrelative (talk) 03:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I actually was about to self-revert that comment, because after posting it I decided it was best to not involve other people just yet. But you removed my comment so fast that I didn't have the chance. Also, posting in one person's user talk is not excessive cross-posting or vote-stacking. 2A02:FE1:7191:F500:1D68:AEEA:EBA5:D751 (talk) 03:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

No but it was clearly "selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you."

I also want to say: I'm happy to work constructively with you despite our having butted heads in the past. This initial revert today was helpful, for instance, and encouraged me to examine the sourcing of the article more broadly. But please understand, the race and intelligence topic area has been subjected to longstanding disruption from a few committed bad actors pushing a narrative of racial superiority, often through numerous sockpuppets. If I'm curt sometimes it's because dealing with this topic is an annoying job, like taking out the trash, and I prefer to do it as efficiently as possible. But it's a job that's got to be done, for the sake of the project. I encourage you to read the RfC here to get a better sense of why we as a community came to the conclusion we did about the fringe nature of racial hereditarianism. Best wishes, Generalrelative (talk) 04:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

You were warned above by Bishonen about pointy editing and personalized commentary, yet your recent post at FTN was highly personalized and a clear admission of editing to make a point: [2]. Please refrain from this behavior in the future. Generalrelative (talk) 23:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@Generalrelative: I asked you in my edit summary here [3] to stop posting on my user talk page, but you've ignored that request. I'll ask you again: please stop. At present more than half of the revisions to my user talk page are from you. 2A02:FE1:7191:F500:1D68:AEEA:EBA5:D751 (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

---