March 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Awesome Aasim. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 19:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Gillingham, Dorset. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 19:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Ponyobons mots 20:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

why did u remove Richard Hopton section on Gillingham Dorset wiki?

edit

Why did you remove Richard Hopton section on Gillingham Dorset wiki, it its sourced in the link i added. 2A00:23C8:3903:5501:207A:43B0:A9D:D6B4 (talk) 19:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Hopton

edit

  Hello, 2A00:23C8:3903:5501:207A:43B0:A9D:D6B4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Hopton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply