2603:7000:2143:8500:B537:D8C7:3373:32F0

Do not post on my talk page anymore

Do not post on my talk page anymore. I am not interested in having any discussions with you there. I have already told you where else you can post your concerns. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

You edit my talkpage edits. That is a new one. I asked you - pointing to the wp rule - how that is OK. --2603:7000:2143:8500:B537:D8C7:3373:32F0 (talk) 04:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

You should try reading the "rule" you provided, since it specifically addresses section headers. Feel free to also read about user talk pages and the links provided there, as you shouldn't be restoring content if it was already removed by an editor from their own user talk page. I am not interested in any further discussion with you so please take care. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Did I restore content already removed? From what I see, I added different content. As to the rule, can you explain how that relates to the header change you made? And is it the case that inlines in headers are OK? And why do you leave partial discussion, with assertions by you, while deleting the responses that clarify the issue - might that perhaps mislead? And did you not say I made assertions, when in fact I asked questions? I'm surprised by an experienced editor (as you say you did) following me right after disagreeing with me and engaging in the editing you did five minutes later. And would hope a helpful editor would say, let me discuss this, rather than say, any discussion must be at ANI or the like. And I would think that the use of the phrase "bizarre" by you as to my well-referenced assertion is perhaps just a bit misplaced, and if so not quite what experienced editors in the best case strive for. 2603:7000:2143:8500:B537:D8C7:3373:32F0 (talk) 04:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

WP:PROD

I noticed you tagged an article for PROD, as non-notable.Please use Wikipedia:CSD A7 instead.Thank you. ―Qwerfjkltalk 07:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

---