April 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Allninemice. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Foot fetishism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ~ANM🐁 T¡C 22:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pearl Rivers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ANM🐁 T¡C 22:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pearl Rivers, you may be blocked from editing. ~ANM🐁 T¡C 22:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021 edit

  Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Ted Nugent, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A recent edit of yours to the page Ted Nugent had an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Edit summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Be careful. You may be blocked from editing without further warning. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Ted Nugent. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposely falsify an edit summary. to the page Ted Nugent Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. This is your final warning. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply