June 2020

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Feminist movement, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ed6767 talk! 20:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Feminist movement. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

(per unaccepted edits) Ed6767 talk! 20:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I thought I'd bring the following policy to your attention: WP:3RR. The passion you're displaying for improving Wikipedia is admirable, but there is a proclivity here towards sourced content that is non-negotiable. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Feminist movement; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, 2600:1700:CF90:D4B0:75A0:F43C:5352:AE9D. You have new messages at Ed6767's talk page.
Message added 20:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

CHINA IS THE BIGGEST COMMUNIST SOCIETY IN THE WORLD ---

THEIR FIGHT FOR FEMINISM IS ABSOLUTELY NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIGHT FOR FEMINISM AROUND THE WORLD.

MAJORITY OF HUMANS ON EARTH LIVE IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES... NOT CHINA.

FEMINISM BEGAN IN WESTERN COUNTRIES AND IT CONTINUES TO BE ADVANCED BY THEM.

BY FOCUSING SOLELY ON THE COUNTRY OF CHINA ON THIS PAGE, YOU ARE MISREPRESENTING THE GREATER MOVEMENT.


IF YOU FEEL IT IMPORTANT TO HAVE A SECTION ON CHINESE FEMINISM ON THIS PAGE, PUT IT AT THE BOTTOM.


THE INTRODUCTION TO THIS PAGE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO INCORPORATE THE CORRECT ASPECTS OF THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT.

WHAT YOU HAVE NOW IS POORLY WRITTEN AND INCORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE MOVEMENT, ITS PHASES, AND ITS GOALS.

THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT IS A WORLDWIDE MOVEMENT AND THE LANGUAGE IN THE INTRODUCTION SHOULD REPRESENT THAT.

WIKIPEDIA PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN SHAPING THE NARRATIVE AND WITH WHAT YOU HAVE NOW IT IS NOT CORRECTLY DOING THAT.

Block notice

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, 2600:1700:CF90:D4B0:75A0:F43C:5352:AE9D. You have new messages at Ed6767's talk page.
Message added 21:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply