24.224.212.90

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Malerooster (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Discussing your opinion of living persons and what you believe their private opinions may be is not a wikipedia editors job.

There is a neutrality cause for that reason. Wikipedias guidelines even uses cannibalism as an example, that as morally repulsive as you may find it this is an encyclopedia not a space for activism or publishing opinion pieces. You can go to opinion outlets or blogs for that.

Therefore the label white nationalist should be removed and more widely used labels such as far-right or alt-light should replace it, and her rejection of the label should be included, because that is what the guidelines demand. "If the subject has denied such allegations, their denial(s) should also be reported."

Otherwise the neutrality clause is violated.

Discussing what one things is the intent of her documentaries or content is also not the job of wikipedia editors.

There are no sources that cite Southern as having popularized the Great Replacement theory, the article should not state this. It is also not central to who she is as a figure, and should be removed from the opening statement. It is a controversial subject brought up as a side statement in some pieces.

Hey malerooster, I don't care. 24.224.212.90 (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Aplogies, I just noticed the threat came from CaligulaAlex. 24.224.212.90 (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

No worries. --Malerooster (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I noticed that you recently removed content from LGBT rights in North Korea without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No, your revert was in error. I put clear comments on my edits explicitly delineating why I removed those items. Please carry on the discussion at article talk. 24.224.212.90 (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

---