217.71.190.202

Removing reliable sources

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sex differences in human physiology. Stop doing this. Replacing journals with blogs is not appropriate. Meters (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Sex differences in human physiology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 06:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Sex differences in human physiology. TylerBurden (talk) 07:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Anupam^Talk 05:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Meters. Your recent edit(s) to the page Participation of women in the Olympics appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. No, 22 out of 997 is not 3% Meters (talk) 06:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Participation of women in the Olympics, you may be blocked from editing. How many times do we have to tell you what to do when your edits are contested? I've already challenged that source, and it does not say that " Women had their own Ancient Olympic Games". Discuss this on the article's talk page or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 06:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Of course it does say that and historically it is well known that the Women's version of the Ancient Olympic Games were called the Heraean Games and the source which I cited states "Women's Olympics: The Heraen" and there are many other sources including another article on Wikipedia which talk about the Women's Ancient Olympic Games which were known as the Heraean Games and it is obvious that Women could not participate in the men's games but obviously men could not participate in the Women's games either and everything has simply always worked like that in life throughout history:-

https://womenshistorylost.weebly.com/the-heraean.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraean_Games

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbaDq8yBVkg217.71.190.202 (talk) 13:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Participation of women in the Olympics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edit and your source have been challenged. Discuss it on the article's talk page or leave it alone or you will be back at the edit warring board again. Meters (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

The weebly page is a personal web site (not a WP:RS) and it does not say that the Heraean Games were the women's Olympics. The Youtube video is a personal post and thus is not WP:RS, it it also does not say that the Heraean Games were the women's Olympics. And the Wikipedia page is not a reliable source (no Wikipedia page is). If there were reliable sources in that page saying that the Heraean Games were the women's Olympics you could reuse them in this article, but the article does not say that the Heraean Games were the women's Olympics. I've opened a discussion on the article's talk page. Do not make this edit again without consensus. Meters (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

If you do not want me to make the edit again I will not do it and it is not a problem but all three articles clearly state that the Heraean Games were the Women's Olympics and that is what they are called and otherwise it would not make any sense and all three sources clearly state that the Heraean Games were the Women's Olympics because the title on the weebly page states: "Women's Olympics: The Heraean", the caption on the YouTube video states: "The Ancient Women's Olympics: Heraean Games" and the Wikipedia article states that the Heraean Games were the Women's version of the Ancient Olympics and they were even older than the men's version because they also started long before and these are all reliable sources because otherwise no sources are reliable and I can quote loads of other Websites which talk about the Heraean Games which were obviously the Women's Olympics and all reasonable sources refer to them like that and they included Swimming, Athletics, Boxing, Wrestling and Horse Racing.217.71.190.202 (talk) 06:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Wretchskull (talk) 08:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

I am not edit warring but I am just trying to put more reasonable material from much better and more reliable sources because the way it is the content simply does not make any sense at all. 217.71.190.202 (talk) 10:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

You have broken 3RR several times over. You are not just edit warring, but you are edit warring disruptive changes. You have been reported to both the edit warring board and the vandalism board. Meters (talk) 10:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your changes were undone by multiple editors, and now you are just blanking the entire section. Meters (talk) 10:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes but that is because the 4 editors are the ones who wrote the original content on the page not because all the people in the world agree with them. 217.71.190.202 (talk) 10:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

I have cited multiple different sources which contain much more realistic and much more reasonable information and the content on the page does not make any sense for sure. 217.71.190.202 (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

At the top of the page itself there is even a notice which states that the claims of the article are false and unverified and if my beneficial edits are being persistently reverted every time then that would obiously mean that the content on the page is unreliable and unreasonable. 217.71.190.202 (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring at Sex differences in human physiology

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

---