Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.


September 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pulmonary embolism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Thingg 04:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Eatabullet (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to 2008 Philadelphia Phillies season. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. QuadrivialMind (talk) 04:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Manny Ramirez. QuadrivialMind (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to History of swimming has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 18:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to History of swimming. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of swimming was changed by 216.236.251.130 (u) (t) deleting 12901 characters on 2008-10-28T13:01:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to History of swimming. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sionus [talk] 18:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Battle of the Bulge. Res2216firestar 18:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 18:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ronald Niel Stuart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 14:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Johnny Damon constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DA Skunk - (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Johnny Damon. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DA Skunk - (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Johnny Damon. DA Skunk - (talk) 15:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1988, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Arachnowhat (talk) 02:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dutch disease, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dutch disease was changed by 216.236.251.130 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-18T23:42:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


 

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Perfectionism (psychology), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you. SoxBot III (talk | owner) 23:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Perfectionism (psychology). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 00:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


 

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dutch disease, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dutch disease was changed by 216.236.251.130 (u) (t) deleting 12382 characters on 2009-01-20T04:12:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gordon College (Massachusetts), you will be blocked from editing. faithless (speak) 04:10, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Geoff Jenkins. Thank you. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 00:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. faithless (speak) 04:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Cosmo Gordon Lang has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SKATER Speak. 00:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manchester High School (Connecticut), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Manchester High School (Connecticut) was changed by 216.236.251.130 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-30T05:10:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Coast has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. King of ♠ 03:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Keira Knightley. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 03:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Morus nigra. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --N419BH (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Brett Hull, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit regarding the "Two Kids and a Goat Line" can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 15:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Young Earth creationism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jesstalk|edits 23:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2010 edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Cylinder seal worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Messengers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Closedmouth (talk) 06:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Mumford & Sons constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sigh No More (Mumford & Sons album). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Your recent edit to the page Nirvana with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dehn's counterexample edit

The counterexample as described at non-archimedean ordered field does not appear to be correct. If the sum of the angles is π exactly, then the parallel postulate should hold. Do you have first hand information to the contrary? Tkuvho (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Madrigal (music). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Booyahhayoob (talk) 03:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Davidiad. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Epicureanism because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  davidiad { t } 15:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of fictional pachyderms has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of fictional pachyderms was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D0d20PGUgQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Download. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ramen, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -download ׀ talk 05:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Flora Nwapa edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Flora Nwapa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to House of Commons— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at House of Commons of the United Kingdom with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Sonicyouth86. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Xenotransplantation because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply