User talk:208.54.95.129/Archive1
Exercise extreme caution in blocking this IP address. As of 23 December 2006, T-mobile uses this IP for over 8,000 locations. The location I'm writing from now has 30 NAT IPs assigned to it. That potentially effects an estimated 240,000 possible nodes. When considering blocking, It is not your average IP. It is not an open WiFi network either, but instead t-mobile collects personal identify information from every customer. This IP may serve as the primary ISP IP for many people. Therefore serious abuse can be reported and traced through the ISP. When blocking be sure to provide diffs on this page to justify the block.
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions. Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. |
Your changes to Pareto efficiency are incorrect. Martin 18:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Spamming
editPlease do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. repeated offenses (The Game, treasure hunting, etc.)
location of this ip
editThis is an IP address associated with an open WAP at Starbucks in Crystal City, Virginia. It has been associated with vandalism and various edits in the past. Blocking it is probably not effective, but leaving a message may be. ... aa:talk 05:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
See the talk page- I don't think your changes are valid. Ekrub-ntyh 17:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop making edits to African Jews, unless you can justify your changes. Ekrub-ntyh 17:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Cedar Crest College. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <Alphachimp talk 17:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
linkspam on sports bio pages
editPlease do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. — Jun. 26, '06 17:11 <[freak]|talk>
Your edit to African Jew
editYour recent edit to African Jew (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I'm posting this message on several accounts in the hope that you'll read it. I've been watching what's been going on recently with this page and I think something needs to be done about it. There are at least four editors (myself included) who seem ready to revert your edits as soon as they are made and there seems little point in your continuing to make them. Let me say I'm not Jewish; I'm not African and I don't know much or have strong opinions about either; I do however trust Kaelus and Ehav on the basis of their editing history and the contents of their talk pages to make rational edits. The reason I keep reverting is that I just don't understand the rationale for removing every occurrence of the word Jew from a page about Jews and I can only conclude that this is politically motivated - please tell me if I'm wrong. In the last few hours I've overlooked a violation of the three reverts rule and the probable use of a second account to circumvent this rule, both of which could potentially get you blocked and I'm hoping I can persuade you to talk about your changes, in line with normal Wikipedia policy rather than constantly reverting to the same version. If you have a problem with the nature of the article or with the current terminology used it might be in your own interests, in order to create a final page that is acceptable to you, to discuss your changes and to try to work towards consensus. Other users have explained their reverts on the article's talk page - why not do the same? At the moment you're coming very close to being blocked. If you would like to reply to this message please do so on my talk page; if you would like to talk about the African Jew article, please do so on the article's talk page. Thank you for reading. --Lo2u 01:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --digital_m e(TalkˑContribs) 18:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Private links
editPlease do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks.
(Despite the Steven Colbert request.} Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mastodon. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Brat32 03:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm at the Atlanta Airport trying to work in Wikipedia and have never had this account blocked. It's a Tmobile account. I have never used it to spam or vandalize. Can you unblock this? It's terrible. 208.54.95.129 01:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
