September 2010

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cam Fowler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Resolute 19:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Pituffik appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 19:28, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inuit with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 19:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at BRIC, you may be blocked from editing. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 03:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scandinavia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Saddhiyama (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Redpath_Sugar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coviepresb1647 (talkcontribs) 13:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to DeLorenzo with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

DeLorenzo

edit

Your changes are breaking links. Please stop. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 04:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Thebestofall007. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Rob Feinstein, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.