In response to the comments made about me by this user, I say:

  • This user does not appear to understand the difference between a factual encyclopaedia article and humour
  • This user has left a scar on my user page and it is not appreciated.
  • Get your own user ID NOW.

--HTait 10:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

May 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Martyn 'Bomber' Bradbury, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Martyn 'Bomber' Bradbury was changed by 202.73.198.161 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-05-22T04:32:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Trier, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 00:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Matt Whelan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JDCMAN (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

References edit

Please tag dead references with {{dead}}, generally they can be found elsewhere on the internet either through an archival service or Google. Same applies for links that have continuously changing content such as [apple.com/iphone]; this is why we include retrieved dates, published date, etc. Also Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a reference therefore we need to re-cite references that may exist in other articles. YuMaNuMa Contrib 03:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Sir Joseph. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ocarina— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sir Joseph (talk) 02:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ocarina with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sir Joseph (talk) 02:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to Nuisance call edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Nuisance call added the name of an apparently non-notable paragraph. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 13:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply