CS1 error on Gal Gadot

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gal Gadot, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Mike Allen 17:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Detailed history:
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

201.188.130.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've been blocked for "disruptive editing", which is not true. There is an user named @MikeAllen who is a very conflictive user, that has deleted my edits just because. 201.188.130.178 (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MikeAllen's reversions of your edits were made under WP:BANREVERT (reverting edits of a banned or blocked user). Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC) That doesn't mean that the edits must be deleted (if the edits are improving articles)Reply
I have restored the declined unblock request that you vandalized by attempting to undelete it. As should be obvious, not only may you not remove declined unblock requests, but you also may not remove administrators' answers to your unblock request. My apologies on the ping @331dot:, but since this involved an administrative action you took, it would have been improper for me to not notify you. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 09:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • If you are blocked, that means you should not be editing at all. Edits by blocked users are not allowed to stand, as that defeats the purpose of the block, which is to keep the blocked user from editing. It is true that if another editor independent of you sees value in the edit, they may restore it, but you shoudn't be the one to. 331dot (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply