201.188.149.181

May 2024

Hello, I'm Morgan695. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Morgan695 (talk) 15:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. You and your other Chile-based dynamic IPs need to cease your disruptive editing with unreliable sources. You are once again bypassing a 6 month block by using yet another different IP address. Trailblazer101 (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't change my IPs, it changes alone, also, why you say that I added unsourced content? I added information with sources in the article of Draft:Untitled Marvel female team-up film; inform yourself and you will know that Olivia Wilde is the director and the movie may be about Black Cat, Silver Sable, Spider-Woman, etc, and there is also a possibility that Felicity Jones returns as Black Cat, see Spider-Man: No Way Home, that is the best example (because Garfield and Maguire returned as Spiderman) 201.188.149.181 (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

By using different IPs regardless of whether you intend to or not, you are still in violation of your block and clearly have not learned from it. The message says "unsourced or poorly sourced". You have constantly added information to WP:unreliable sources into articles. IMDb is unreliable, as are the other websites you have cited. This potential Marvel female film was an idea suggested at Marvel Studios. The Olivia Wilde Marvel female film you mentioned is at Sony, reportedly for Spider-Woman. That film info is covered at Sony's Spider-Man Universe and Draft:Untitled Sony Marvel female-led film. These are NOT the same, and saying they are is WP:Original research and WP:SYNTHESIS, which is not allowed. You clearly don't seem to be willing to understand or familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy on reliable sourcing and your repeated ban evasions and unreliable additions have become quite disruptive within the past year that they have gone on for. If you don't want your IP to keep changing, then I would urge you to WP:Create an account after the 6 month block on your initial IP expires, rather than repeatedly continuing adding unreliable sources and making these disruptive edits. You are knowingly violating your other IP blocks and that is not allowed on Wikipedia. Trailblazer101 (talk) 08:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Honestly, you need to just stop making edits to Wikipedia. I've tried to assume good faith here but you have demonstrated a clear pattern of behavior of being either unwilling or unable to understand what a reliable source is. It seems like you genuinely believe that everything you see online is real and accurate information, and I don't see how someone with that outlook is capable of contributing positively here. Morgan695 (talk) 15:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

You can keep coming back but your edits will never remain for very long. It's really a waste of time for you and everyone else. Just stop at this point. Jesus. Mike Allen 22:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

What do you mean? Exactly 201.188.149.181 (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Hercules (upcoming film). You are still adding unreliable sources and now misusing edit summaries. Your latest edit was not a "fix" as you called it. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Then search a "reliable" source to add, everyone knows that Ritchie is not the director of that movie anymore (it seems that you are in denial) 201.188.149.181 (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Or you can always be constructive, remain WP:CIVIL, not assume something about others, and WP:Do it yourself. The reason why no reliable sources have picked up on it is sheerly because it cannot be verified. It is simply a rumor at best. Not everything you read on the internet is true. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Club 33. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

201.188.149.181 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for "disruptive editing" or "vandalism", maybe I added too many things, but I haven't had intentions to vandalise Wikipedia, besides, everything that I added is with sources. There are users that get the thing wrong such as deleting drafts that I created; for example: Draft:Metroid (film) and Draft:The Hunchback of Notre Dame (Disney remake)201.188.149.181 (talk) 08:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's not wrong to delete content made by a blocked or banned user who shouldn't be editing at all. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not getting the point, I know that I "shouldn't" edit Wikipedia because I am an anonymous user, but some users (such as User:MikeAllen) deleted my edits calling it "vandalism" or "disruptive editing" which is not. For example; in Snow White & the 7 Dwarfs (Disney remake) I added that Emilia Faucher and Alan Tudyk are going to appear as Young Snow White and the Magic Mirror, which is true by the way, and that was deleted; and I suppose that it is because I am anonymous user. If that is the reason, it wouldn't make no sense to delete edits that are clearly improving articles

It has already been explained to you that you have repeatedly been citing WP:unreliable sources in your additions, which violate Wikipedia policies. If you cannot see or understand what sources are genuine and true and which ones are spreading misinformation or rumors, then that is why you probably should cease editing and serious reconsider your actions and approach, and not because you are editing anonymously. You have also used misleading edit summaries such as saying you "fixed" material when in actuality, you restored contested additions, not to mention editing under different IPs (whether intentional or not) in violation of a prior six month block on one of your IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

You are not permitted to modify or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block, such as you did here. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 12:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

---