September 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to [[:Francia Almend�rez]], did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DCEdwards1966 16:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to [[:Francia Almend�rez]]. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. DCEdwards1966 16:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2009 edit

Your edits to October 25 edit

Dear 201.144.5.38,
  Some of your edits on the page October 25 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Salma Hayek. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm YodaRULZ. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Walter Gaitán because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! YodaRULZ (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Tbhotch. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to San Luis F.C. seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tigres de la UANL. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Tigres de la UANL, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit Warring edit

Please do not continue to edit war at Tigres de la UANL without leaving an informative edit summary or opening a discussion about your changes. If you continue to revert without explaining your actions, you may be blocked for edit warring. Thank you. King Jakob C2 18:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. – Alex43223 T | C | E 18:19, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tigres de la UANL edit

I understand that you're just trying to change that one section from a list to prose, as the tag requests. That's good!...the problem appears to be that you're adding a lot of additional, unsourced material and expressing opinions. For now, just try taking the information that's there and rephrasing it.WQUlrich (talk) 19:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Tigres de la UANL, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Do not add unsourced content and DO NOT edit war. Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 20:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tigres de la UANL, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Luis Miguel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.  MegastarLV  (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Tigres de la UANL, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:23, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Edgar Iván Pacheco. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Israel Jiménez. Thank you. GoPurple'nGold24 00:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Natalie Portman. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 20:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lucas Lobos. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lucas Lobos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dustin Lance Black. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Ucla90024 (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to Lucas Lobos edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s). In particular, something potentially negative or defamatory about a living person needs a reliable source Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Infobox stats edit

Hi, I just wanted to let you know infobox stats account for league stats only; other competitions are excluded. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply