August 2017 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gregory Campbell (politician), this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 23:51, 15 August 2017

August 2017 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gregory Campbell (politician) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jamie Bryson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 00:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Creationism, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Creationism was changed by 2.29.61.73 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88275 on 2017-08-16T00:44:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


September 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cookstown— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Troubles restrictions edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Your edit warring over Janet Devlin is in breach of this discretionary sanction as the issue falls under Troubles restrictions. Please cease with it as you may be blocked from editing. Mabuska (talk) 21:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you have evidence Janet considers or calls herself Irish please provide it, otherwise you have no case for your edit. Mabuska (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Violation of Troubles restrictions edit

You have been reported for violating the above restrictions you were notified of yesterday. Please see here. Mabuska (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Troubles-related edit warring and vandalism edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for Troubles-related edit warring and vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at AE. This is a normal administrator block and not an AE block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply