198.55.233.67

AfC notification: Draft:Sociodicy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sociodicy. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Since "sociodicy" is a scientific (at least social scientific) term, many of the sources are indeed behind paywalls. But not all of them are. And, in any case, many wikipedia articles necessarily refer to paywalled sources. Still, if you google 'sociodicy' you get a decent number of hits, with enough public sources to get a sense of the thing. My own sense, having encountered this word in a NYT article, was that it warranted an entry in wikipedia. 198.55.233.67 (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

PS: Thanks for reviewing the article on "sociodicy." 198.55.233.67 (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sociodicy has been accepted

Sociodicy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

---