1952socrates
Welcome!
Hello, 1952socrates, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:1952socrates, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat 17:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:1952socrates
edit
A tag has been placed on User:1952socrates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 17:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
{{helpme}} 1952socrates (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- --Diego Grez (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:1952socrates/success feelosophy
edit A tag has been placed on User:1952socrates/success feelosophy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 17:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Help query
editYour question.
1952socrates (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I have spent many hours, carefully following the article wizard and creating your first article instructions -finally I have produced this draft for editing/improvement. If I can be informed as to how it can be improved, I will do my best to do so. Thank you
- I am not sure what your (User:1952socrates) specific question is, but seeing the issues you seem to be having, I think it would be useful for you to study up on all of the following:
- There's a lot of good information there, hope it helps! Shearonink (talk) 18:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Help query (10:12, 11 September 2010) from User:1952socrates
editThe advice I was given I have already spent many hours on -I have spent days trying to prepare my first article!! Basically I am unable to discover exactly what the criticism is really about. I am trying to provide an article about 3 new scientific terms very relevent for the 21st century ie The Science of Learning The skills We Need To Succeed Success Feelosophy I am unable to discover what is needed to make this articles acceptable to Wikipedia. 1952socrates (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- If you'd like to know more about WIkipedia and you are trying to construct your first article, please read all (really, all) of the following bullet-pointed Wikipedia articles. As a teacher (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_experience_feedback), I am sure you know that one does not attempt to master a subject on the first day of class. Mastery only comes with time and study. That being said, all you have to do is study up on the following subjects, then you should be good to go!
- Hope this helps, Shearonink (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Dear Shearlink -Thank you - Although I feel I have spent an inordinate amount of time studying and complying with all you have quoted, I will repeat the whole process again and try to display the skills we need to succeed that the article is about. The reason that the article is so significant is because it is about 'success feelosophy' ie the scientific research that is now available to help everyone learn to succeed -so I will try to apply it!!!
(1952socrates (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)).