Welcome edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for British Columbia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will try to answer your questions as best as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. CutOffTies (talk) 13:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Joan Ryan. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Klilidiplomus+Talk 11:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joan Ryan with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 11:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

note: edit

I have reverted your edit. Unless you /ARE/ the editor in question, (in which case you should log in to edit your own posts) it is not proper to be removing or editing another person's comments on talk pages. There are of course exceptions to this such as personal attacks or vandalism - neither of which are relevant in this case. Chedzilla (talk) 13:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

(Of course it's not Jennifer.) The edit would be improper in any case, with the stupid edit summary. See also User talk:193.239.220.249. Bishonen | talk 13:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC).Reply

Copying licensed material requires attribution edit

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Small power you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Model United Nations in the United States edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Model United Nations in the United States, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply