January 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pa'l Mundo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop re-inserting the data and discuss on the talk page. Muhandes (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Muhandes. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more of your recent additions to the page The Last Don 2 because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Muhandes (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Last Don 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Last Don 2, you may be blocked from editing. I am warning you for the fifth time. Please stop the disruptive editing, misrepresenting sources and contributing not in English. Muhandes (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Last Don (album), you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page King of Kings (Don Omar album) has been reverted.
Your edit here to King of Kings (Don Omar album) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/es/release/18204430-Don-Omar-King-Of-Kings) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to The Last Don (album) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to The Last Don (album) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/es/release/462346-Don-Omar-The-Last-Don) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Last Don 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 04:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

English and incorrect representation of sources.

edit

First, I repeat my comment above. If you can't contribute in proper English don't contribute. Second, you are misrepresenting what sources say. The source says In 2015, he released his 6th studio album, The Last Don II. Moreover, he released another album titled “The Last Album” in 2019. Alright, he earned almost $6 million dollars from his studio album. If you read the entire source more carefully you understand that the 6 million figure is for all his albums combined. --Muhandes (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop reintroducing the material. It is not "confirme", whatever you mean by that word. --Muhandes (talk) 13:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

top-charts.com

edit

Consensus is that these charts should not be included so please stop adding them. You've been warned five times already about disruptive editing, continue this and you will be blocked. --Muhandes (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive editing: introducing unreliable sources, introducing false information, refusal to communicate

edit

Hi there. I am warning you over and over but you keep ignoring me. Your edits are disruptive. You introduce material which most editors believe is unreliable, e.g. here, where two editors already reverted it as unreliable. You introduce false information too. here you claimed "Angelito" won the Premio Lo Nuestro in 2007. A simple search shows it only won Video of the Year, see Premio Lo Nuestro 2007. In this edit you invented an award, see 7th Annual Latin Grammy Awards for what Don Omar was nominated for. There is also a serious competence issue with your contributions, and I have to correct almost every single one of them. However, this is not the worst problem. The worst problem is that you refuse to communicate. I have left you multiple comments and you ignore them, re-introducning material without discussion. Please note that communication is required. Please stop the disruptive editing if you want to continue to contribute. --Muhandes (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

XLinkBot message

edit

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to King of Kings (Don Omar album) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to King of Kings (Don Omar album) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/es/release/16393917-Don-Omar-Adios) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Important notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Muhandes (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

Hi, IP user. You have been warned repeatedly above for disruptive editing, but have never responded nor changed the way you edit. Perhaps you are not aware of having this page, your own talkpage? You have been blocked for a month, and I hope the note in the block log will help you find the page. Please respond below, to show that you have found it, and that you understand the problems you have been warned about. If you undertake to stop causing these problems, especially as described in this post, you can be unblocked. Bishonen | tålk 11:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC).Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

190.5.46.74 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I ask please one unlock, l understand the reason and I just want to contribute. 190.5.46.74 (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your understanding by telling us the issues here, committing to change them, and telling us what you will edit about. 331dot (talk) 12:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • 331dot, instead of replying to you, the user has been evading their block with the account Romberd, which was created a week before my block but never used until this IP was blocked. IP, you can't get away from your history or from your block by creating sockpuppets. A block applies to the person, not to a particular account. Creating an account is a good idea, but not while you're blocked! I have blocked the Romberd account, since it has been violating our policies by evading a block. Please respond to 331dot's comment above as well as you can. If you are able to convince him and me that you will try to edit in compliance with our policies, you can be unblocked, and will be allowed to choose whether you want to edit with this IP, or with the Rogerd account, which can then be unblocked. Would that be OK with you, 331dot? Just don't try to deceive us again, and don't create any more socks. Bishonen | tålk 18:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC).Reply
I would be fine with that. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I get it, I just want to do the right thing, if I will contribute to the policies of Wikipedia.

We don't want you to contribute to the policies. As 331 said, we want you to show that you get it, by telling us what problems you were causing, and to say how you will avoid causing these problems in the future. Also to say what you will edit about, if you're unblocked. 331 already told you these things, in the "Decline reason", and you haven't done any of it. Sorry, but you'll have to try again. I'm not trying to torment you; I just want you to show that you're competent to edit here. Repeating "I understand" and "I get it" doesn't show that, and doesn't convince. Bishonen | tålk 21:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC).Reply

I know I made a mistake, in evade block and do one war of edition, I will not evade the block, and I'm just going to edit and discuss on the page of one Article, and understand the reason for the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.5.46.74 (talk) 22:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

What do you think, 331dot? There's obviously a language problem. Do you believe there is good will? Bishonen | tålk 12:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC).Reply
I am concerned about the language issue, but I think the user means well. We can always address CIR later if need be. 331dot (talk) 13:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
OK, thanks. IP, we believe in your good intentions, and you have been unblocked. If you have any questions about appropriate editing, please ask. Bishonen | tålk 22:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC).Thank you, for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.5.46.74 (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

IP, if you rather edit as Romberd (which I personally think you should, but you don't have to) I think these fine admins will be happy to unblock that account for you. Otherwise, you are free to continue editing as IP, with the limitations of this setting. --Muhandes (talk) 09:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, yes I prefer edit with. Romberd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.5.46.74 (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please sign your messages and please use proper indentation (I corrected it for you), see HELP:TALK. Pinging Bishonen to please unblock Romberd. --Muhandes (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

190.5.46.74 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I Understand the reason, I ask an unblock, I want to get better the "Language English" I pledge to improve the Language English, please. Only I want contribute and edit with sources reliable.. ¡Only I ask one chance!

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Please: Only I want contribute and better the Language English. Only I want have the correct, capacity on ¡English Wikipedia!
@331dot: Hello, I ask an unblock, Only I want contribute Wikipedia English, understand the reason, I what to get better Language English.—